Loading...

Ninety minutes. Two engineers. No salespeople.

You share your codebase and your worst problem. Two of our engineers read it with you and tell you what they see — on the call, while you can still argue with it. You keep the recording and the written findings whether or not anything follows.

Price

No charge

Nothing to sign, no follow-up sequence

Duration

90 minutes

Usually within the same week

On the call

2 engineers

The people who would do the work

What happens in the ninety minutes.

The same five parts every time, in the same order, because a session that wanders ends up being about us rather than about your system.

01

Context

10 min

What the system does, who depends on it, what money or obligation runs through it, and what specifically went wrong. We are listening for consequence, not for features.

02

Repository walkthrough

30 min

You share a screen and we read. Structure, dependencies, the last hundred commits, the tests if there are any, and the parts your team avoids touching. The parts people avoid are usually the answer.

03

Architecture and failure modes

25 min

How it is deployed, what it depends on, where state lives, and what happens when each of those fails. This is where most sessions turn up something the client did not know.

04

Findings, out loud

20 min

We tell you what we saw, on the call, while you can still argue with it. Not in a follow-up deck a week later when it has been softened for the relationship.

05

What we would do, and roughly what it costs

5 min

An honest range and an honest sequence — or, when it applies, that you do not have a problem worth paying us to solve.

What this is not.

Not this[cite: 5]

  • ✕ A pitch. There is no deck, and there are no slides about our history[cite: 5]
  • ✕ A sales call. The two people on it are engineers who will be on the work[cite: 5]
  • ✕ A qualification screen dressed as advice[cite: 5]
  • ✕ Contingent on anything. There is nothing to sign and no follow-up sequence[cite: 5]
  • ✕ A commitment. Most reviews do not become engagements, and that is expected[cite: 5]

What you leave with[cite: 5]

  • ✓ A recording of the full session[cite: 5]
  • ✓ Written findings within two business days[cite: 5]
  • ✓ An honest read on whether the problem needs us at all[cite: 5]
  • ✓ If it does: a scoped range for a Systems Audit[cite: 5]
  • ✓ If it does not: that, said plainly, in writing[cite: 5]

What to bring.

Preparation takes about twenty minutes on your side. The session is materially better if we have read the repository beforehand.

Read access, or a screen

Either read access to the repository beforehand, or someone who can share a screen and navigate it live. Beforehand is better — we arrive having read it.

Read access, or a screen

Either read access to the repository beforehand, or someone who can share a screen and navigate it live. Beforehand is better — we arrive having read it.

Read access, or a screen

Either read access to the repository beforehand, or someone who can share a screen and navigate it live. Beforehand is better — we arrive having read it.

Read access, or a screen

Either read access to the repository beforehand, or someone who can share a screen and navigate it live. Beforehand is better — we arrive having read it.

Questions before you buy.

Why is it free when the audit is eighteen thousand dollars?

Because ninety minutes costs us two engineers’ afternoon, and because we would rather spend that than write a proposal for work we do not understand. It also disqualifies quickly in both directions, which is worth more to us than a filled calendar.

The audit is expensive because it is weeks of work and produces documents you can act on. The review is ninety minutes and produces an opinion. Those are different things and they are priced differently.

The test is simple and you should apply it: if ninety minutes pass and nobody has asked about your budget, your timeline or your decision-making process, it was not a sales call.

We publish this claim because it is checkable. If your experience differs from this page, that is a legitimate reason to distrust everything else on this site, and we would want to hear about it.

Bring it anyway. A meaningful share of what looks like a code problem turns out to be an ownership problem, a scope problem, or two teams with incompatible assumptions. We will say so if that is what we see, and that answer costs you nothing here.

Yes. Send yours and we will sign it in advance.

Yes, though it is a weaker session. We can work from architecture diagrams, incident history and a conversation, and we will tell you which of our conclusions are therefore lower-confidence.

Five ways to engage us.

Nobody signs a modernization program to a firm they met last week. Each rung below exists to de-risk the next one, and every client we have on a program today started somewhere near the top of this list.

Rung 01

Code & Risk Review

Ninety minutes, live and recorded. Two of our engineers, your codebase and your worst problem. You keep the findings whether or not you hire us. This is not a sales call — there are no salespeople on it.

No charge

90 minutes

Rung 02

Systems Audit

Our named diagnostic. Fixed price, fixed scope, walk-away clause: you own the architecture map, risk register, remediation plan and a fixed-price build proposal regardless of what you do next.

$18K – $35K

2 – 3 weeks

Rung 03

Stabilization Sprint

Stop the bleeding on a failing system, or take one stalled AI pilot the whole way into production. Most companies we meet have exactly one of these waiting.

$85K – $180K

8 – 12 weeks

Rung 04

Modernization Program

The rebuild. Phased and milestone-billed, with a named architect and a steering cadence you can take to a board. Almost never sold cold — it is bought by people who already watched us.

$250K – $750K

6 – 12 months

Rung 05

Embedded Engineering Pod

Four to six engineers and a tech lead, running your roadmap under our delivery process. The rung that compounds, and the one we have been doing longest.

$28K – $65K

per month, ongoing

LET'S BUILD YOUR AI FUTURE

Tell us about your project and we’ll be in touch.

Celebrating Our Silver Jubilee – 25 Years Of Custom Software Development Excellence | Since 2002

WebFix believes in transparent and upfront pricing. By knowing your anticipated budget, we can provide a more accurate and customized scope for your project.

$0

©2002-2026 Webfix, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Webfix™

Design By Founder/CEO – Shahzad Ali